so.. to solve this, someone from the dev team or a representative could ask ask these questions (which sps? rebalance in the sense of skill effects or values?). and issue a statement about things hard to execute, things they are working on.. etcI think the issue resides in the fact that there are a plethora of suggestions which have not been specifically detailed by players for the developers to take in (I also realize there are suggestions which are specific but hard to execute). For example: sp rebalancing - which sps? rebalance in the sense of skill effects or values?
this isn't even about suggestions only but overall engagement with the community. and it is in no way "insane".. it's not like there is hundreds of new threads everyday. and your overall point doesn't even make much sense quite honestly, if it's insane to have a community manager to actually interact with the community then it is also insane to have gms in game and board mods.From entwell or even GF's perspective its insane to attempt to sort out every suggestion made on every server for just one game (keep in mind developers have several games).
you know what would be a great step towards that? well i talked about it this whole thread, wanna take a guess on what it is?I think if players have a proper productive and polite discussion in game or on forums about pros/cons then we would see more updates.
keep in mind we are not sure how big the development/rep team is from GF or entwell or what their responsibilities are and that nostale in its prime had a huge number of suggestions (most revolved around new sp/raid releases/new content). I am just trying to voice the perspective that if was the employee in charge of being a rep for a gaming platform for every game - there is so much information you need to keep on top of (not every game is as dead as nostale). For example I'll use nostale as an example and list some specific suggestions:
- fix control z bug
- fix f5-f8 key bug for auto lock on
- sp balance - change values/effects and cast animations of certain sps such as scout, zerk, etc (DR lower mana patch please :D)
- Offering a starter pack w/ pots, mount (effective in act 1-3?), high rare lvl 45 eq, gold % (1-55?) buff for new players
- Reduce limit of the number of buffs on a player
P.S. As i was making the list of suggestions I realized many of the suggestions left do not greatly impact the player base or are outdated, or taken --> guess gf is doing a pseudo good job?
I also realize an argument can be made that not every game is as active in giving suggestions as I'm alluding them to be.
Dialogue is appreciated, I like engaging about suggestions in forums hence why I post a lot. I'm guessing based on your response you think a rep should be a part of discussing the pros and cons for suggestions but I think it becomes ill suited since half the time players just insult each other. For example, take 99% of the server merge posts.
In conclusion, for those that can't tell: I don't think a rep is necessary, but I am open to the idea of a producer/developer letter of sorts in which goals or deliverables for the year are outlined in patches to come. For example, LoL interviews with employees on the dev team have explained the company releases about 4-5 new champions a year (or some crap like that), and the GF announcement of server merges planned for 2019.